Template
Infrastructure Fund Due Diligence Checklist
An infrastructure checklist for regulatory exposure, concession risk, leverage, inflation linkage, and long-duration asset quality.
What this template is for
Infrastructure diligence focuses on long-duration cash flows, regulatory frameworks, concession or contract risk, leverage, inflation linkage, and where the strategy sits on the risk spectrum from core to value-add. This checklist helps LP teams distinguish durable infrastructure cash flows from assets that only look defensive in a marketing deck.
When LP teams use it
- Core infrastructure open-ended fund evaluation
- Core-plus or value-add closed-ended fund evaluation
- Energy transition infrastructure fund evaluation
- Digital infrastructure fund evaluation
- Transportation, utilities, renewable power, midstream, social, or communications infrastructure evaluation
- Emerging markets infrastructure fund evaluation
- Re-up evaluation for an existing infrastructure manager
- IC preparation for an infrastructure fund commitment
The template
Strategy and sector
- Core, core-plus, value-add, opportunistic, or greenfield
- Open-ended or closed-ended structure
- Brownfield vs. greenfield exposure
- Sector mix: transportation, utilities, energy, renewables, digital, social, midstream, communications, waste, water
- Geographic concentration
- Developed markets vs. emerging markets exposure
- Regulated vs. contracted vs. merchant exposure
- Essential-service characteristics
- Asset life and remaining useful life
- Control vs. minority ownership
- Platform strategy vs. single-asset exposure
- Where this fund sits in the firm's product set
- What makes the strategy hard to replicate
- What market environment would make this strategy struggle
Portfolio fit
- Role this manager would play in our portfolio
- Existing exposure to this GP or related infrastructure strategy
- Overlap with current infrastructure or real assets managers
- Sector exposure created by this commitment
- Geographic exposure created by this commitment
- Expected income vs. appreciation contribution
- Expected inflation sensitivity
- Expected duration and liquidity profile
- Vintage-year exposure context
- Commitment pacing impact
- Recommended commitment size and rationale
- What the portfolio loses if we pass
- What risk the portfolio takes if we commit
- Re-up view: increase / maintain / reduce / pass / undecided, if applicable
Cash flow profile
- Yield component vs. capital appreciation
- Contracted revenue percentage
- Regulated revenue percentage
- Merchant revenue percentage
- Counterparty quality on contracts
- Remaining contract life
- Concession length and renewal risk
- Volume and demand risk
- Availability-based revenue exposure
- Take-or-pay or minimum-volume protections
- Revenue escalation terms
- Operating cost pass-through rights
- Inflation linkage: regulated, indexed contract, pass-through, or implicit
- Lag between inflation and revenue adjustment
- Revenue downside case
- Distribution policy
- Expected cash yield vs. total return
Inflation linkage and pricing power
- Source of inflation protection
- Contract index used: CPI, RPI, PPI, tariff formula, other
- Frequency of inflation adjustment
- Caps, collars, or floors on inflation pass-through
- Regulatory approval needed for tariff increases
- Ability to pass through operating costs
- Ability to pass through capex
- Historical evidence of inflation pass-through
- Inflation linkage by asset or sector
- Mismatch between inflation-linked revenue and fixed-rate costs
- Mismatch between inflation-linked revenue and floating-rate debt
- Cases where inflation pass-through failed or was delayed
Regulatory and political exposure
- Regulated revenue exposure by jurisdiction
- Key regulator or public authority
- Regulatory reset schedule
- Recent regulatory changes affecting strategy
- Tariff-setting and allowed return framework
- History of adverse regulatory decisions
- Political risk in target geographies
- Public-private partnership framework, if applicable
- Concession-granting authority
- Expropriation, nationalization, or contract-renegotiation risk
- Permitting and community or stakeholder opposition risk
- Local-content, labor, or foreign ownership requirements
- Currency convertibility or repatriation risk, if applicable
- How the manager monitors regulatory change
Concession and contract risk
- Concession start and end date
- Remaining concession life
- Renewal process and renewal history in jurisdiction
- Termination rights and compensation on termination
- Change-in-law and force majeure provisions
- Performance obligations and minimum capex requirements
- Maintenance and handback obligations
- Penalties for underperformance
- Counterparty default protections
- Contract concentration by counterparty
- What happens if the concession is not renewed
Sourcing and acquisition discipline
- Sourcing channels
- Proprietary vs. auction process mix
- Government, utility, sponsor, corporate, or developer relationships
- Partnerships with operators or developers
- Pipeline size vs. actual deployment
- Deals won and why
- Deals passed on and why
- Entry valuation discipline (EV/EBITDA, cap rate, yield, sector basis)
- Control premium paid, if any
- Competition from strategics, corporates, pension funds, sovereigns
- Evidence that sourcing advantage is repeatable
Operational capability
- In-house operating partners or external operators
- Asset management depth
- Engineering and technical capability
- Construction and development expertise
- Regulatory affairs and commercial contracting expertise
- Power marketing or offtake expertise, if applicable
- Procurement and maintenance planning
- Health, safety, cyber, and physical security process
- Operating KPI reporting by asset
- Examples where operating capability created value
- Examples where operating plans missed expectations
Construction and greenfield risk, if applicable
- Greenfield exposure limit
- Development stage at acquisition
- Permitting, land rights, and interconnection status
- EPC contract type and contractor quality
- Fixed-price or cost-plus exposure
- Construction budget and contingency reserve
- Delay and cost overrun history
- Completion guarantees
- Revenue start-date assumptions and ramp-up risk
- Technology risk
- Completed projects vs. budget and timeline
Leverage and capital structure
- Asset-level leverage by sector
- Fund-level leverage policy
- Target and maximum loan-to-value
- Fixed vs. floating-rate debt mix
- Interest rate hedging
- Debt maturity and refinancing schedule
- Debt service coverage ratio and covenants
- Project finance structure; recourse vs. non-recourse
- Construction debt exposure
- Currency and inflation mismatch between debt and revenue
- Subscription line and NAV facility use
- Stress case under higher rates, lower demand, or delayed refinancing
- How leverage contributed to historical returns
Valuation and marks
- Valuation policy, frequency, internal vs. third-party
- Valuation committee composition
- Discount rate methodology and terminal value assumptions
- Inflation, demand, volume, and commodity assumptions
- Regulatory reset assumptions
- Comparable transaction support
- Treatment of greenfield and delayed or impaired assets
- History of write-downs
- Realized exits vs. prior marks
- Sensitivity to discount rate changes
- Valuation transparency in reporting
ESG, energy transition, and physical risk
- Energy transition and legacy energy exposure
- Carbon intensity by asset or sector
- Transition risk from policy, technology, or demand changes
- Physical climate risk: flood, wildfire, heat, storm, drought
- Environmental permitting and biodiversity or land-use concerns
- Community impact, labor, and safety practices
- Human rights or supply-chain considerations
- Decommissioning obligations and environmental liabilities
- Insurance availability and cost trends
- ESG, mission, exclusion, or policy constraints relevant to the LP
Performance
- Gross and net IRR, TVPI, DPI by fund
- Yield vs. capital appreciation split
- Realized vs. unrealized performance
- Cash yield by vintage and distribution stability
- Performance through regulatory, commodity, and rate cycles
- Performance by sector, geography, and asset type
- Loss ratio by asset
- Top-asset concentration of returns
- Benchmark comparison: infra-specific, CPI-plus, public or private infra benchmarks
- Performance excluding the top one or two assets
- Leverage-adjusted performance
- Attribution: yield, multiple expansion, operations, leverage, inflation, FX
Terms specific to infrastructure
- Management fee rate and basis
- Fee basis during and post investment period
- Carry, hurdle, catch-up, and waterfall
- GP commitment
- Fund term and extension rights
- Recycling, co-investment, and key-person provisions
- Removal, LPAC, valuation, reporting, and ESG reporting rights
- Open-ended redemption terms, if applicable
- Side letter asks
- Any terms that deviate from market
Operational due diligence
- Fund administrator, auditor, counsel, tax advisor, valuation provider
- Operating partner, engineering, and regulatory advisor relationships
- Compliance program and CCO
- Cybersecurity and business continuity
- Conflicts, allocation, and related-party transaction policy
- Insurance coverage
- Environmental review process
- Anti-bribery, corruption, and sanctions controls
- Past or pending litigation, regulatory, environmental, or compliance matters
References
- On-list and off-list LP references
- Operating partner and joint venture partner references
- Lender references
- Regulatory or public authority references, if available
- Technical advisor and former employee references
- Feedback on asset management quality and regulatory judgment
- Feedback on construction execution, if applicable
- Feedback on communication through stress
- Feedback on valuation transparency
Re-up specific questions, if applicable
- What changed since the prior fund
- Has the strategy moved up the risk spectrum
- Have sector, geography, fund size, or leverage shifted
- Has merchant, greenfield, or development exposure increased
- Has regulatory exposure or valuation discipline changed
- Did prior assets perform for the reasons we underwrote
- Were cash flows and distributions durable
- Did the manager communicate well through regulatory, rate, or commodity stress
- Increase, maintain, reduce, or pass
- What would make us not re-up
Red flags and mitigants
- 'Core' label with meaningful merchant exposure
- Concession renewal assumed rather than underwritten
- Inflation linkage claimed but capped, delayed, or discretionary
- High floating-rate leverage without adequate hedging
- Near-term refinancing risk
- Regulatory reset risk not reflected in downside case
- Greenfield exposure without demonstrated construction track record
- Commodity price exposure hidden inside contracted revenue
- Concentration in one sector, geography, regulator, or counterparty
- Valuation marks unsupported by transaction evidence
- Energy transition risk in legacy assets
- Political or permitting risk understated
- Open-ended liquidity terms mismatched to illiquid assets
- Related-party operator or fee conflicts
- For each: severity, manager explanation, LP team view, mitigant, owner, status
Final diligence conclusion
- One-paragraph investment view
- Primary reason to invest
- Primary reason not to invest
- Biggest underwriting question
- Biggest regulatory, concession, or leverage question
- Open diligence items
- Recommended commitment size
- Recommendation: proceed / proceed with conditions / defer / pass
- Conditions to close
- Items to monitor after commitment
- Reviewer confidence level
Common mistakes
- Underweighting merchant and refinancing risk in 'core-plus' labels
- Treating concession renewal as automatic
- Crediting inflation linkage without reading the contract
- Ignoring energy transition exposure in legacy energy portfolios
- Mixing regulated and merchant assets in a single 'core' bucket
- Ignoring regulatory reset schedules
- Underestimating construction and permitting risk
- Treating contracted revenue as risk-free without checking counterparty quality
- Failing to test asset-level leverage under higher rates
- Accepting long-duration cash flow claims without downside cases
- Ignoring currency, political, and repatriation risk in emerging markets
- Not separating yield, leverage, inflation, and valuation effects in performance attribution
How Allocator Desk manages this in a live system
- Creates an infrastructure diligence workflow with regulatory, merchant, concession, leverage, inflation-linkage, and construction-risk fields
- Tracks concession length, contract maturity, regulatory reset dates, debt maturity, and refinancing schedules by manager and fund
- Surfaces inflation-linkage commentary across quarterly letters, annual meetings, and manager updates
- Connects regulatory changes, concession events, construction delays, and refinancing updates to the manager monitoring record
- Maps ESG, climate, tax, reporting, side letter, and co-investment terms into the obligations record
- Links quarterly monitoring, annual meeting notes, references, and prior IC memos into the re-up decision
- Turns infrastructure diligence from a generic real assets review into a searchable record of cash-flow durability, regulatory exposure, and long-duration risk