AAllocator DeskDiligence Memory

All Templates

Template

Infrastructure Fund Due Diligence Checklist

An infrastructure checklist for regulatory exposure, concession risk, leverage, inflation linkage, and long-duration asset quality.

What this template is for

Infrastructure diligence focuses on long-duration cash flows, regulatory frameworks, concession or contract risk, leverage, inflation linkage, and where the strategy sits on the risk spectrum from core to value-add. This checklist helps LP teams distinguish durable infrastructure cash flows from assets that only look defensive in a marketing deck.

When LP teams use it

  • Core infrastructure open-ended fund evaluation
  • Core-plus or value-add closed-ended fund evaluation
  • Energy transition infrastructure fund evaluation
  • Digital infrastructure fund evaluation
  • Transportation, utilities, renewable power, midstream, social, or communications infrastructure evaluation
  • Emerging markets infrastructure fund evaluation
  • Re-up evaluation for an existing infrastructure manager
  • IC preparation for an infrastructure fund commitment

The template

Strategy and sector

  • Core, core-plus, value-add, opportunistic, or greenfield
  • Open-ended or closed-ended structure
  • Brownfield vs. greenfield exposure
  • Sector mix: transportation, utilities, energy, renewables, digital, social, midstream, communications, waste, water
  • Geographic concentration
  • Developed markets vs. emerging markets exposure
  • Regulated vs. contracted vs. merchant exposure
  • Essential-service characteristics
  • Asset life and remaining useful life
  • Control vs. minority ownership
  • Platform strategy vs. single-asset exposure
  • Where this fund sits in the firm's product set
  • What makes the strategy hard to replicate
  • What market environment would make this strategy struggle

Portfolio fit

  • Role this manager would play in our portfolio
  • Existing exposure to this GP or related infrastructure strategy
  • Overlap with current infrastructure or real assets managers
  • Sector exposure created by this commitment
  • Geographic exposure created by this commitment
  • Expected income vs. appreciation contribution
  • Expected inflation sensitivity
  • Expected duration and liquidity profile
  • Vintage-year exposure context
  • Commitment pacing impact
  • Recommended commitment size and rationale
  • What the portfolio loses if we pass
  • What risk the portfolio takes if we commit
  • Re-up view: increase / maintain / reduce / pass / undecided, if applicable

Cash flow profile

  • Yield component vs. capital appreciation
  • Contracted revenue percentage
  • Regulated revenue percentage
  • Merchant revenue percentage
  • Counterparty quality on contracts
  • Remaining contract life
  • Concession length and renewal risk
  • Volume and demand risk
  • Availability-based revenue exposure
  • Take-or-pay or minimum-volume protections
  • Revenue escalation terms
  • Operating cost pass-through rights
  • Inflation linkage: regulated, indexed contract, pass-through, or implicit
  • Lag between inflation and revenue adjustment
  • Revenue downside case
  • Distribution policy
  • Expected cash yield vs. total return

Inflation linkage and pricing power

  • Source of inflation protection
  • Contract index used: CPI, RPI, PPI, tariff formula, other
  • Frequency of inflation adjustment
  • Caps, collars, or floors on inflation pass-through
  • Regulatory approval needed for tariff increases
  • Ability to pass through operating costs
  • Ability to pass through capex
  • Historical evidence of inflation pass-through
  • Inflation linkage by asset or sector
  • Mismatch between inflation-linked revenue and fixed-rate costs
  • Mismatch between inflation-linked revenue and floating-rate debt
  • Cases where inflation pass-through failed or was delayed

Regulatory and political exposure

  • Regulated revenue exposure by jurisdiction
  • Key regulator or public authority
  • Regulatory reset schedule
  • Recent regulatory changes affecting strategy
  • Tariff-setting and allowed return framework
  • History of adverse regulatory decisions
  • Political risk in target geographies
  • Public-private partnership framework, if applicable
  • Concession-granting authority
  • Expropriation, nationalization, or contract-renegotiation risk
  • Permitting and community or stakeholder opposition risk
  • Local-content, labor, or foreign ownership requirements
  • Currency convertibility or repatriation risk, if applicable
  • How the manager monitors regulatory change

Concession and contract risk

  • Concession start and end date
  • Remaining concession life
  • Renewal process and renewal history in jurisdiction
  • Termination rights and compensation on termination
  • Change-in-law and force majeure provisions
  • Performance obligations and minimum capex requirements
  • Maintenance and handback obligations
  • Penalties for underperformance
  • Counterparty default protections
  • Contract concentration by counterparty
  • What happens if the concession is not renewed

Sourcing and acquisition discipline

  • Sourcing channels
  • Proprietary vs. auction process mix
  • Government, utility, sponsor, corporate, or developer relationships
  • Partnerships with operators or developers
  • Pipeline size vs. actual deployment
  • Deals won and why
  • Deals passed on and why
  • Entry valuation discipline (EV/EBITDA, cap rate, yield, sector basis)
  • Control premium paid, if any
  • Competition from strategics, corporates, pension funds, sovereigns
  • Evidence that sourcing advantage is repeatable

Operational capability

  • In-house operating partners or external operators
  • Asset management depth
  • Engineering and technical capability
  • Construction and development expertise
  • Regulatory affairs and commercial contracting expertise
  • Power marketing or offtake expertise, if applicable
  • Procurement and maintenance planning
  • Health, safety, cyber, and physical security process
  • Operating KPI reporting by asset
  • Examples where operating capability created value
  • Examples where operating plans missed expectations

Construction and greenfield risk, if applicable

  • Greenfield exposure limit
  • Development stage at acquisition
  • Permitting, land rights, and interconnection status
  • EPC contract type and contractor quality
  • Fixed-price or cost-plus exposure
  • Construction budget and contingency reserve
  • Delay and cost overrun history
  • Completion guarantees
  • Revenue start-date assumptions and ramp-up risk
  • Technology risk
  • Completed projects vs. budget and timeline

Leverage and capital structure

  • Asset-level leverage by sector
  • Fund-level leverage policy
  • Target and maximum loan-to-value
  • Fixed vs. floating-rate debt mix
  • Interest rate hedging
  • Debt maturity and refinancing schedule
  • Debt service coverage ratio and covenants
  • Project finance structure; recourse vs. non-recourse
  • Construction debt exposure
  • Currency and inflation mismatch between debt and revenue
  • Subscription line and NAV facility use
  • Stress case under higher rates, lower demand, or delayed refinancing
  • How leverage contributed to historical returns

Valuation and marks

  • Valuation policy, frequency, internal vs. third-party
  • Valuation committee composition
  • Discount rate methodology and terminal value assumptions
  • Inflation, demand, volume, and commodity assumptions
  • Regulatory reset assumptions
  • Comparable transaction support
  • Treatment of greenfield and delayed or impaired assets
  • History of write-downs
  • Realized exits vs. prior marks
  • Sensitivity to discount rate changes
  • Valuation transparency in reporting

ESG, energy transition, and physical risk

  • Energy transition and legacy energy exposure
  • Carbon intensity by asset or sector
  • Transition risk from policy, technology, or demand changes
  • Physical climate risk: flood, wildfire, heat, storm, drought
  • Environmental permitting and biodiversity or land-use concerns
  • Community impact, labor, and safety practices
  • Human rights or supply-chain considerations
  • Decommissioning obligations and environmental liabilities
  • Insurance availability and cost trends
  • ESG, mission, exclusion, or policy constraints relevant to the LP

Performance

  • Gross and net IRR, TVPI, DPI by fund
  • Yield vs. capital appreciation split
  • Realized vs. unrealized performance
  • Cash yield by vintage and distribution stability
  • Performance through regulatory, commodity, and rate cycles
  • Performance by sector, geography, and asset type
  • Loss ratio by asset
  • Top-asset concentration of returns
  • Benchmark comparison: infra-specific, CPI-plus, public or private infra benchmarks
  • Performance excluding the top one or two assets
  • Leverage-adjusted performance
  • Attribution: yield, multiple expansion, operations, leverage, inflation, FX

Terms specific to infrastructure

  • Management fee rate and basis
  • Fee basis during and post investment period
  • Carry, hurdle, catch-up, and waterfall
  • GP commitment
  • Fund term and extension rights
  • Recycling, co-investment, and key-person provisions
  • Removal, LPAC, valuation, reporting, and ESG reporting rights
  • Open-ended redemption terms, if applicable
  • Side letter asks
  • Any terms that deviate from market

Operational due diligence

  • Fund administrator, auditor, counsel, tax advisor, valuation provider
  • Operating partner, engineering, and regulatory advisor relationships
  • Compliance program and CCO
  • Cybersecurity and business continuity
  • Conflicts, allocation, and related-party transaction policy
  • Insurance coverage
  • Environmental review process
  • Anti-bribery, corruption, and sanctions controls
  • Past or pending litigation, regulatory, environmental, or compliance matters

References

  • On-list and off-list LP references
  • Operating partner and joint venture partner references
  • Lender references
  • Regulatory or public authority references, if available
  • Technical advisor and former employee references
  • Feedback on asset management quality and regulatory judgment
  • Feedback on construction execution, if applicable
  • Feedback on communication through stress
  • Feedback on valuation transparency

Re-up specific questions, if applicable

  • What changed since the prior fund
  • Has the strategy moved up the risk spectrum
  • Have sector, geography, fund size, or leverage shifted
  • Has merchant, greenfield, or development exposure increased
  • Has regulatory exposure or valuation discipline changed
  • Did prior assets perform for the reasons we underwrote
  • Were cash flows and distributions durable
  • Did the manager communicate well through regulatory, rate, or commodity stress
  • Increase, maintain, reduce, or pass
  • What would make us not re-up

Red flags and mitigants

  • 'Core' label with meaningful merchant exposure
  • Concession renewal assumed rather than underwritten
  • Inflation linkage claimed but capped, delayed, or discretionary
  • High floating-rate leverage without adequate hedging
  • Near-term refinancing risk
  • Regulatory reset risk not reflected in downside case
  • Greenfield exposure without demonstrated construction track record
  • Commodity price exposure hidden inside contracted revenue
  • Concentration in one sector, geography, regulator, or counterparty
  • Valuation marks unsupported by transaction evidence
  • Energy transition risk in legacy assets
  • Political or permitting risk understated
  • Open-ended liquidity terms mismatched to illiquid assets
  • Related-party operator or fee conflicts
  • For each: severity, manager explanation, LP team view, mitigant, owner, status

Final diligence conclusion

  • One-paragraph investment view
  • Primary reason to invest
  • Primary reason not to invest
  • Biggest underwriting question
  • Biggest regulatory, concession, or leverage question
  • Open diligence items
  • Recommended commitment size
  • Recommendation: proceed / proceed with conditions / defer / pass
  • Conditions to close
  • Items to monitor after commitment
  • Reviewer confidence level

Common mistakes

  • Underweighting merchant and refinancing risk in 'core-plus' labels
  • Treating concession renewal as automatic
  • Crediting inflation linkage without reading the contract
  • Ignoring energy transition exposure in legacy energy portfolios
  • Mixing regulated and merchant assets in a single 'core' bucket
  • Ignoring regulatory reset schedules
  • Underestimating construction and permitting risk
  • Treating contracted revenue as risk-free without checking counterparty quality
  • Failing to test asset-level leverage under higher rates
  • Accepting long-duration cash flow claims without downside cases
  • Ignoring currency, political, and repatriation risk in emerging markets
  • Not separating yield, leverage, inflation, and valuation effects in performance attribution

How Allocator Desk manages this in a live system

  • Creates an infrastructure diligence workflow with regulatory, merchant, concession, leverage, inflation-linkage, and construction-risk fields
  • Tracks concession length, contract maturity, regulatory reset dates, debt maturity, and refinancing schedules by manager and fund
  • Surfaces inflation-linkage commentary across quarterly letters, annual meetings, and manager updates
  • Connects regulatory changes, concession events, construction delays, and refinancing updates to the manager monitoring record
  • Maps ESG, climate, tax, reporting, side letter, and co-investment terms into the obligations record
  • Links quarterly monitoring, annual meeting notes, references, and prior IC memos into the re-up decision
  • Turns infrastructure diligence from a generic real assets review into a searchable record of cash-flow durability, regulatory exposure, and long-duration risk