AAllocator DeskDiligence Memory

All Templates

Template

GP Reference Call Template

A structured script for reference calls that surfaces real signal, not the polished version.

What this template is for

Gives every team member a consistent set of reference questions so calls produce comparable, attributable notes. Designed for on-list and off-list LP references, portfolio company CEOs, and former employees.

When LP teams use it

  • Reference checks during initial diligence on a new GP
  • Reference refresh during a re-up decision
  • Off-list calls developed through the LP network
  • Post-departure calls with former GP employees

The template

Call metadata

  • Reference name and role
  • Relationship to the GP (on-list, off-list, ex-employee, portfolio company)
  • How the reference was sourced
  • Date and consent to record / take notes
  • Confidentiality expectations

Relationship and exposure

  • How long have you known the GP and in what capacity?
  • Which funds are you invested in or which deals did you work on?
  • What is your commitment size relative to the rest of your portfolio?
  • Are you re-upping in the next fund?

Team and judgment

  • Who is the strongest partner? Who would you not want to lose?
  • Have you seen the team handle a tough situation? What happened?
  • How do they treat junior people?
  • How do they handle disagreement inside the partnership?

Process and discipline

  • How do they source? Is it really proprietary?
  • Have you seen them pass on a deal? Why?
  • Where do they get pricing wrong?
  • How do they behave in a down round or a difficult exit?

LP relationship

  • Are reports on time and useful?
  • How responsive are they to LP questions?
  • How did they handle a recent issue you raised?
  • Have they ever surprised you in a way you didn't like?

Open-ended (the signal questions)

  • What would you want to know that I haven't asked?
  • Who else should I talk to that wouldn't be on their list?
  • If you were starting fresh, would you commit again?
  • On a scale of one to ten, how confident are you in this team?

For LP references

Use when the reference is another LP in the fund.

  • Are you re-upping? At the same size, larger, or smaller?
  • Have you changed commitment size in either direction, and why?
  • How transparent is the GP when something goes wrong?
  • How do they handle bad news - early, late, or only when asked?
  • Have you sat on the LPAC? What did that surface?
  • Would you introduce them to your peers?

For portfolio company CEOs

Use when the reference is a CEO or founder of a current or former portfolio company.

  • Did the GP help beyond the board meeting?
  • Where were they most useful?
  • Where were they not useful, or actively unhelpful?
  • How did they behave when the company missed plan?
  • How did they handle a difficult personnel or strategy decision?
  • Would you take their capital again?

For former employees

Use when the reference previously worked at the firm. Approach carefully and respect confidentiality.

  • Why did you leave?
  • How are decisions really made? Who has real authority?
  • Who carries the investment judgment on the team?
  • How is carry actually split, and is the stated alignment real?
  • What would worry you if you were an LP?
  • Is there anyone there you would specifically want to invest behind?

Red flags to listen for

Phrases that often sound positive on a reference call but signal underlying risk. Note any that come up verbatim.

  • "We are re-upping, but at a smaller size."
  • "The senior partner is excellent, but I do not know the newer team as well."
  • "They are very responsive during fundraising."
  • "The strategy has evolved over time."
  • "The junior team does most of the work."
  • "Reporting is fine once you ask."
  • "They are more institutional now."
  • "We have not had a major issue with them yet."
  • "I would talk to someone who worked with them during a difficult exit."
  • "They are great fundraisers."

Call outcome

Force a conclusion at the end of the call. This is what makes the note useful three months later.

  • Overall reference quality: strong / mixed / weak
  • Net signal: positive / neutral / negative
  • Most important positive signal
  • Most important concern or hesitation
  • Did the call confirm, weaken, or change our diligence view?
  • Follow-up items and owner
  • Additional references suggested
  • Should this affect the IC recommendation?
  • Reviewer confidence level (1-5)

Common mistakes

  • Asking only the on-list references and stopping there
  • Letting the GP set the call format or attend the call
  • Not asking 'who else should I talk to?' (the highest-yield question)
  • Failing to log the call so the next person re-asks the same questions
  • Treating a glowing reference as confirmation rather than data
  • Recording notes but never writing the call outcome
  • Using LP-style questions on portfolio CEOs or ex-employees

How Allocator Desk manages this in a live system

  • Logs every reference call with reviewer, date, structured notes, and call outcome
  • Links calls back to the fund being diligenced and the IC memo
  • Captures off-list references developed across the team
  • Stores red-flag phrases as searchable signal across the GP relationship
  • Surfaces patterns when the same GP comes back for the next fund